top of page

Why Leadership Teams are not like other teams

  • Writer: Nazly Frias
    Nazly Frias
  • Jul 10
  • 3 min read

Updated: Sep 19

If you’ve ever been on a leadership team, you know it’s different. The stakes are higher. The conversations are more complex. And the dynamics, often invisible, can shape the fate of an entire organization.


And yet, many organizations treat leadership teams like any other team. As if being a high-performing executive automatically translates into being part of a high-performing leadership team.


It doesn’t.

Here’s why.


Leadership teams operate under extreme ambiguity


Unlike project or function-specific teams, leadership teams must constantly shift between strategic oversight and operational alignment, with few clear success metrics for how they function together.


Instead, they navigate paradoxes:

  • Long-term strategy vs. short-term execution

  • Innovation vs. risk mitigation

  • Growth vs. sustainability


They're expected to operate both in the organization and on the organization, which means constantly shifting perspective and priority. It’s not always clear where the work of the team ends and the work of the team members begins.


And decisions rarely come with perfect information. 


Alignment isn’t about consensus, it’s about navigating trade-offs with shared purpose and clarity, even when the path forward is uncertain.


The stakes are higher, and so are the barriers to candor


When you’re part of a leadership team, often, words carry outsized weight. That’s what makes these teams powerful and what can make true candor difficult.


Disagreement can feel politically risky. Raising a concern can feel like overstepping. Leaders may default to silence to preserve cohesion.


The result?

  • Agreement in the room

  • Misalignment in execution

  • Fragmented accountability downstream


Without psychological safety at the top, issues don’t disappear, they travel underground.


Misalignment at the top cascades across the organization


When a leadership team isn't aligned, everyone feels it. 


The signals may be subtle—conflicting guidance, shifting priorities, or unclear mandates—but they erode clarity and confidence in the long run.


Conversely, when a leadership team is aligned not only on what needs to happen but also on how they’ll work together to achieve it, it creates clarity that ripples outward.



So what makes a leadership team effective?


It’s not just trust or talent.

It’s not just offsites and KPIs.

It’s the quality of conversation, the clarity of commitment, and the ability to navigate tension well.


Here’s what we’ve seen work:


Leadership teams don’t need more meetings; they need better conversations.


Too many leadership teams spend time together without truly aligning. Real alignment happens when people feel heard, challenged, and clear on what they’re saying yes to.


That requires space for generative dialogue, not just reporting and reacting.


High-performing teams don’t just allow disagreement; they engineer it.


Disagreement isn’t dysfunction. Unspoken disagreement is.


Great leadership teams create structured ways to surface tension before it becomes resistance:

  • Rotating devil’s advocates

  • Pre-mortem and post-mortem reviews

  • Dedicated time to challenge assumptions


It’s not about consensus. It’s about clarity.


Invest in team effectiveness, not just individual development


Many companies invest heavily in executive coaching (which matters). But fewer invest in the leadership team as a unit. That’s where the leverage lives.


Yet it’s the leadership team’s ability to align, decide, and model shared leadership that sets the tone for the entire organization.


Team coaching, strategic facilitation, and regular alignment sessions aren’t perks. They’re high-leverage investments.


Final thoughts


Leadership teams hold enormous leverage and enormous complexity.


They operate in paradox. They influence everything and yet often lack the space to do their own alignment work. They’re made up of smart, capable individuals who’ve been rewarded for independence but who now need to operate with deep interdependence.


The difference between a collection of high-performing leaders and a truly aligned leadership team isn’t subtle. It’s strategic. It’s cultural. And it’s felt across the entire organization.


If you’re on a leadership team, it’s worth asking not just how well you’re working together but what kind of team you actually are.



About the Author


Nazly Frias is the founder of Leadership Impact, a boutique leadership advisory practice specialized in executive teams and senior leaders in impact-driven professional service firms and organizations.


With over 15 years of international experience, Nazly brings a unique dual perspective: she has served as both an insider—leading and being part of leadership teams in global impact consulting firms and public innovation labs—and as an external trusted advisor. This combination allows her to understand the internal dynamics, pressures, and blind spots that leadership teams face while maintaining the objectivity needed to guide transformational change.


Originally from Colombia, Nazly works with clients across the globe in English and Spanish and is based in Berlin.



Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
bottom of page