What Makes a Leadership Transition High-Stakes?

Not every leadership transition is high-stakes. But some are more than we realize.

Leadership transitions are often treated as standard career events. When someone moves up, over, or into a new context, we offer a warm welcome, a 90-day plan, and hope they find their footing quickly.

However, in my experience, coaching and advising leaders and leadership teams across various sectors and continents, I have found that some transitions carry far more risk, pressure, and complexity than others.

And when those transitions aren’t properly supported, the cost can be high: misalignment, slow traction, team churn, or even early derailment.

So, how do you know when a transition is just a change and when it’s a real inflection point?

Not all transitions are created equal

Let’s be clear: all leadership transitions involve some degree of change. But not all require the same level of support.

Some transitions are lower-stakes. They’re still meaningful, but the environment allows for learning, iteration, and adjustment in motion.

These often include:

• Lateral moves within a familiar organization or team

• Scope increases that build incrementally on past experience

• Internal promotions in stable environments with high trust and clear expectations

In these situations, psychological safety is higher. The leader likely knows the culture, the relationships are already in place, and there’s space to grow without intense scrutiny.

Support still helps, but it may take the form of mentoring, check-ins, or light coaching.

So what makes a transition high-stakes?

A transition becomes high-stakes when there’s more to lose, more to navigate, and less margin for error. It’s not always about job level; it’s about context and complexity.

Here are six factors that tend to increase the stakes:

1. High visibility: The role is in the spotlight, reporting to the CEO, influencing the board, or managing a highly watched initiative.

   
   

2. Cultural unfamiliarity: The leader is new to the organizational or "local" culture, with unspoken norms and expectations to decode.

   
   

3. Strategic weight: The role is tied to major business outcomes—growth, transformation, or crisis recovery.

   
   

4. Emotional legacy: The transition often follows layoffs, the departure of a beloved or controversial predecessor, or deep-seated organizational fatigue.

   
   

5. Shift in leadership identity: The leader is transitioning from an expert to an orchestrator, from an operational to a strategic focus, or from leading tasks to leading people.

   
   

6. Compressed timelines and unclear expectations: There’s pressure to show value immediately, but little time to understand the system or build trust.

These are the transitions that require sensemaking, not just action. Support, not just onboarding. And a recalibration of expectations, not just a checklist of deliverables.

Why this distinction matters

One of the most common mistakes I observe in organizations is treating all transitions equally. But if we don't recognize which ones are high-stakes, we risk:

• Giving too little support, too late

• Asking for quick wins without clarity or context

• Missing the opportunity for long-term impact by rushing the start

On the other hand, when we achieve the right level of support, we accelerate trust, decision quality, and cultural integration.

So what does thoughtful support look like?

In high-stakes transitions, leaders often benefit from:

• Structured space to map relationships and sense the system: Not just who reports where, but who influences whom, and how decisions really get made.

  
  

• Dedicated time to reflect, reframe, and recalibrate, often with a coach or trusted advisor who can help them think through both the visible role and the invisible shifts in identity.

  
  

• Clear but humane expectations from the system: Leaders need to understand what success looks like early on but also feel safe naming what’s unclear or in flux.

And perhaps most importantly: They need to know they’re not alone in navigating it.

Final thoughts

Leadership transitions are a normal part of growth. However, some carry more weight, complexity, and risk than others.

Recognizing when a transition is high-stakes isn’t just helpful; it’s a form of care. For the leader, the team, and the organization, they’re stepping into.

---

About the Author

Nazly Frias is the founder of Leadership Impact, a boutique leadership advisory practice specialized in executive teams and senior leaders in impact-driven professional service firms and organizations.

With over 15 years of leadership experience across global impact consulting firms and public innovation labs, Nazly combines the credibility of an insider with the clarity of an external advisor and executive coach.

She helps senior leaders and executive teams navigate complex challenges—from individual performance breakthroughs to organizational transformations—by leveraging real-world leadership experience with evidence-based practices and emerging leadership approaches.

Originally from Colombia, Nazly works with clients across the globe in English and Spanish and is based in Berlin.

Get in touch with Nazly